Governance structure and the weighting of performance measures in CEO compensation

By Antonio Dávila, Fernando Penalva. 2006

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd1f90f9e30a4430a8b4a9e674ddb15fd59b4c73

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Juan Manuel García Lara
2. Beatriz García Osma
3. Fernando Penalva
4. Daniel B. Thornton
5. Arnt Verriest
6. A. Gaeremynck
7. Martin Walker
8. Araceli Mora

In Strategy and Management

1. Juan Manuel García Lara
2. Beatriz García Osma
3. Fernando Penalva
4. Arnt Verriest
5. Daniel B. Thornton
6. A. Gaeremynck
7. Lara Al-Haddad
8. Mark R. Whittington

Citations in the corpus

• Accounting conservatism and corporate governance (2009, methodology): “We measure the level of governance using an approach similar to the one in Bertrand and Mullainathan (2001) and Davila and Penalva (2006).”
• The Sources of Value Destruction in Acquisitions by Entrenched Managers (2012, unknown): “Further, even ignoring a direct entrenching effect of the provisions, a preponderance of these provisions at a firm likely indicates a generally self-serving approach by management and an accommodating board (see e.g., Davila and Penalva, 2006).”
• The Economic Determinants of Conditional Conservatism (2009, unknown): “We use the governance measure (GOV) proposed by Davila and Penalva (2006), which includes both internal and external corporate governance provisions.”
• Board of Directors' Characteristics and Conditional Accounting Conservatism: Spanish Evidence (2007, unknown): “Recent literature provides evidence that the use of indexes that aggregate several governance measures allows classifying firms in accordance to the strength of their governance more successfully (see, e.g. Gompers et al., 2003; Davila and Penalva, 2006).”
• The Impact of Corporate Governance on IFRS Adoption Choices (2013, background): “…construct; different governance practices are likely to complement one another (Aguilera et al., 2008) and empirical evidence implies that aggregated indices gauge governance strength more accurately than single indicators (Gompers et al., 2003; Davila and Penalva, 2006; Garcia Lara et al., 2007).”