Thinking about commitment: Accessibility of commitment and prediction of relationship persistence, accommodation, and willingness to sacrifice

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A daily diary study (2013, background): “…because it bodes well for relationships, including repair of faltering relationships (Dindia & Baxter, 1987), greater satisfaction (Huston, 1994; Huston & Chorost, 1994; Stafford & Canary, 1991), and greater commitment (Canary & Stafford, 1994; Etcheverry & Le, 2005; Stafford & Canary, 1991).”
Investing in Affection: An Investigation of Affection Exchange Theory and Relational Qualities (2010, result): “” Previous research reports acceptable reliability (α = 86; Etcheverry & Le, 2005 ), with our study reporting an alpha of .”
Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice (2011, methodology): “Willingness to sacrifice for the environment Based on items used in past relationship research (Etcheverry & Le, 2005), we developed a 5-item measure of willingness to sacrifice (WTS) to assess whether individuals were willing to sacrifice their own needs for the sake of the environment (e.g., “I…”
The Investment Model of Commitment Processes (2011, methodology): “Taking a social cognitive approach, Etcheverry and Le (2005) tested and found support for the notion that the cognitive accessibility of commitment moderates the association between self-reported commitment and relationship persistence, accommodative responses, and willingness to sacrifice.”