Measurement reactivity in diary research.
By W. Barta, Howard Tennen, M. Litt. 2012
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcec9eda5e547f84d0add4c2d046e55e93fcccef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- N. van Berkel
- C. Wrzus
- Vassilis Kostakos
- Denzil Ferreira
- Matthias R. Mehl
- M. Back
- François Mairesse
- Tal Yarkoni
Citations in the corpus
- The Experience Sampling Method on Mobile Devices (2017, background): “As stated by Barta et al. (2012), “a study participant who rated her depressed mood as 5 on a 5-point scale might on a subsequent report rate the same intensity of depressed mood as 3 or 4 because she has come to realise that her depressed mood could be considerably more severe than the mood to whic”
- Lab And/Or Field? Measuring Personality Processes and Their Social Consequences (2015, background): “First, evidence suggests that with typical momentary assessments on several days, reactivity is often negligible (Barta et al., 2011; Conner & Reid, 2012; see however Larson & Sbarra, 2015).”