On the Quantification of the Network Capacity Deferral Value of Distributed Generation

By H. Gil, Geza Joos. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2006

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcde5f60e0580a895aaea690871451c944b5b778

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Antonio Piccolo
2. A. Robin Wallace
3. Pierluigi Siano
4. Lion Hirth
5. Gareth P. Harrison

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Pierluigi Siano
2. Antonio Piccolo
3. A. Robin Wallace
4. Lion Hirth
5. Gareth P. Harrison
6. L. Reichenberg
7. Tu Berlin
8. Tom Brown

Citations in the corpus

• Exploring the Tradeoffs Between Incentives for Distributed Generation Developers and DNOs (2007, methodology): “With further work an approach similar to [30] could be implemented within the OPF framework.”
• Models for Quantifying the Economic Benefits of Distributed Generation (2008, unknown): “As previously mentioned, in our own research on the quantification of this benefit, we have obtained figures of up to 1200 $/kVA depending on the location of the DG and the load growth rate [6].”
• DG Impact on Investment Deferral: Network Planning and Security of Supply (2010, background): “Gil and Joos [9] developed an approach based on the amount that network radial feeder currents are reduced by a DG unit.”
• Market value of solar power: Is photovoltaics cost-competitive? (2015, background): “[18], in other cases it might increase investment needs [19]-[21].”