Exploring the Tradeoffs Between Incentives for Distributed Generation Developers and DNOs
By Gareth P. Harrison, Antonio Piccolo, Pierluigi Siano, A. Robin Wallace. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2007
191 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/414c99ccfcca77577c295710546b5fae69ad6356
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Pierluigi Siano
- Carlo Cecati
- Shahram Jadid
- Alireza Zakariazadeh
- Tooraj Jamasb
- Gareth P. Harrison
- Michael Pollitt
- P. Joskow
Citations in the corpus
- DG Impact on Investment Deferral: Network Planning and Security of Supply (2010, background): “Earlier work [11], [12] showed that recognition of the investment deferral benefits plays a crucial role in minimizing apparent conflicts in deciding desirable penetrations of DG from the DNO and DG developer point-of-view.”
- Distributed Generation Storage, Demand Response, and Energy Efficiency as Alternatives to Grid Capacity Enhancement (2014, background): “For example, DGs uptake can expose the grid to induced energy losses when installed capacity exceeds the demand (Harrison et al., 2007).”
- Combined Operations of Renewable Energy Systems and Responsive Demand in a Smart Grid (2011, methodology): “In order to maximize the objective function, the nonlinear programming formulation of the OPF, described in [47]–[51], is modified including the AMS and DSM.”
- Economic-environmental energy and reserve scheduling of smart distribution systems: A multiobjective mathematical programming approach (2014, methodology): “On the other end, environmental concerns that arise due to the operation of fossil fuel fired electric generators, change the classical economic electricity operational planning problem into a multi-objective emission/economic operational planning problem [11–13].”