The norm activation model and theory-broadening: Individuals' decision-making on environmentally-responsible convention attendance
By Heesup Han. 2014
358 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcb1dcf1d62a30007bc2425691ae514269644b10
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Marketing
Citations in the corpus
- Tackling the Complexity of the Pro-environmental Behavior Intentions of Visitors to Turtle Sites (2019, background): “This is in accordance with the results of Han (2014; 2015), Hsu and Huang (2012), and Kim and Han (2010).”
- The value–belief–emotion–norm model: investigating customers’ eco-friendly behavior (2017, background): “Han (2014) also identified that these positive and negative anticipated forms of affect increase/decrease when travelers believe they feel a sense of joint responsibility for environmentally harmful consequences.”
- Predicting the revisit intention of volunteer tourists using the merged model between the theory of planned behavior and norm activation model (2020, background): “Although the NAM can be viewed as sequential or non-consecutive, the generally accepted mechanism for activating personal norm is sequential (Han, 2014).”
- Drivers of customer decision to visit an environmentally responsible museum: merging the theory of planned behavior and norm activation theory (2017, background): “Previous studies in pro-environmental behavior have acknowledged the essence of these processes in fortifying environmentally responsible intention/behavior (see for example Bamberg et al., 2007; Chen & Tung, 2014; Han, 2014; Harland et al., 1999, 2007; Klöckner, 2013; Klöckner & Matthies, 2004).”
- Tourists’ Pro-environmental Behaviors: Moral Obligation or Disengagement? (2020, background): “Recent studies have analyzed tourists’ senses of obligation or moral standards to engage in PEBs (Dolnicar and Leisch 2008; Han 2014, 2015; Han and Hyun 2017; Li and Wu 2019).”
- Emerging bicycle tourism and the theory of planned behavior (2017, background): “In the arena of hospitality and tourism, there is also strong support for this socio-psychological theory (e.g. Han, 2014; Han et al., 2010; Hsu & Huang, 2012; Kim et al., 2013; Ong & Musa, 2011; Quintal et al., 2010; Teng et al., 2015).”
- The theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model approach to consumer behavior regarding organic menus (2018, methodology): “The NAM framework has been used in previous studies to examine the role of pro-social motives in consumer’s environmentally responsible decision making (Han, 2014).”
- Towards Building Sustainable Consumption: A Study of Second-Hand Buying Intentions (2020, result): “The study also showed that both an awareness of consequences and the ascription of responsibility directly influences the personal norm, which is consistent with some former studies [62] but opposite to another [80].”
- Factors influencing non-green consumers’ purchase intention: A partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach (2021, methodology): “Ascription of Responsibility: The study measured AR using a 5item scale adapted from past studies (Ebreo et al., 2013; Han, 2014).”