Effectiveness Research in Marriage and Family Therapy

By D. Sprenkle. 2002

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bca39b23156c37d5eb08cba4c714591be6f9114c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. C. Hollist
2. Richard B. Miller
3. H. Brunner
4. Eric P. Milne
5. Charlotte Burck
6. Scott F. Jakubowski
7. A. Tweed
8. Peter Ward

Citations in the corpus

• A review of empirically supported marital enrichment programs (2004, background): “Despite these criticisms, the EST approach is gaining popu larity and influence in the mental health professions (Sprenkle, 2003).”
• Perceptions of Attachment Style and Marital Quality in Midlife Marriage (2005, background): “Th e discipline of marriage and family therapy is moving in an evidence-based direction (Sprenkle, 2002), with clinical research becoming an important part of the discipline.”
• Comparing qualitative research methodologies for systemic research: the use of grounded theory, discourse analysis and narrative analysis (2005, background): “These outcome studies are vital in ensuring family therapy’s place within the psychological therapies (see e.g. Carr, 2000; Cottrell, 2003; Cottrell and Boston, 2002; Law and Crane, 2000; Leff et al., 2000; Sprenkle, 2003).”