Perceptions of Attachment Style and Marital Quality in Midlife Marriage

By C. Hollist, Richard B. Miller. 2005

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d1b9763314f6095c53dd74dec0ec886802c6a8e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Peter Ward
2. Neil R. Lundberg
3. Kristen Berrett
4. R. Zabriskie

In Social Psychology

1. Neil R. Lundberg
2. Peter Ward
3. Kristen Berrett
4. R. Zabriskie
5. P. Freeman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Kristen Berrett
2. R. Zabriskie
3. Neil R. Lundberg
4. Peter Ward

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring Marital Satisfaction: A Comparison of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Satisfaction with Married Life Scale (2009, methodology): “For more than a decade the RDAS has been used in research and clinical settings to categorize satisfied and unsatisfied couples (e.g., Cook & Jones, 2002; Hollist & Miller, 2005; Schramm, Marshall, Harris, & Lee, 2005; Zimmerman, Prest, & Wetzel, 1997).”
• A Review of the Factors Associated with Marital Satisfaction (2017, background): “Research has shown that when both spouses have secure attachment styles, they experience greater marital satisfaction [56], have better communication skills [57], higher cohesion and flexibility, and show the highest level of adaptability.”