Optimal design of pro-conservation incentives

By A. Zabel, B. Roe. 2009

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc9c0d26d196729ff725e6a4cb88792365aad916

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services (2016, background): “For example, agri-environmental payments can be made on the basis of a farmer’s nitrate content in the soil relative to average values of nitrate content in the soil of all farmers in the area (Zabel and Roe, 2009).”
Ex-post compensation payments for wolf predation on livestock in Italy: a tool for conservation? (2010, background): “…of the assessment and verification of conservation outcomes (e.g. carnivore offspring), difficulties in reliably measuring the outcome, and induced distortion by scheme participants, with the risk of making payments even though the conservation goal has not been entirelymet (Zabel and Roe 2009).”
Evaluating farmers’ likely participation in a payment programme for water quality protection in the UK uplands (2013, background): “Literature has addressed the design and potential operation of PES systems from theoretical and empirical perspectives (Antle et al. 2003; Claassen et al. 2008; Jack et al. 2008; Schlüter et al. 2009; Zabel and Roe 2009), considered the efficiency of alignment between payments and outcome delivery (”
Combining performance-based and action-based payments to provide environmental goods under uncertainty (2013, methodology): “8Ill-defined objectives may favor action-based payments compared to performance-payments (Zabel and Roe 2009).”
Managing Increasing Environmental Risks Through Agro-Biodiversity and Agri-Environmental Policies (2010, unknown): “…at large in terms of positively inﬂuencing the 1 A third strategy, which is not explicitly considered here, is the use of risk-reducing inputs into the agricultural production process, such as e.g. irrigation, fertilizer, pesticides, or enhanced (through breeding or genetic modiﬁcation) varieties.”
Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries (2013, background): “Zabel and Roe (2009) discuss the economic theory of performance payments and briefly highlight and compare four different payment approaches with various briefly illustrated field examples.”