Framing effects: An analytic–holistic perspective ☆

By Todd McElroy, J. J. Seta. 2003

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc9aeec9d0e9462023bd9f97e07b01d8adb08170

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. W. Bruine de Bruin
2. Baruch Fischhoff
3. Timo Mäntylä
4. F. Del Missier
5. Andrew M. Parker
6. Heather Butler
7. K. Stanovich
8. Wiebke Eberhardt

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Andrew M. Parker
2. F. Del Missier
3. Baruch Fischhoff
4. W. Bruine de Bruin
5. Timo Mäntylä

Citations in the corpus

• Susceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-to-experience influences responses to anchoring cues (2007, unknown): “Recently, individual differences have been found in numerical reliance (Bartels, 2006; McElroy & Seta, 2003; Peters, Vastfall, & Slovic, 2006; Simon, Fagley, & Halleran, 2004), ambiguity (Lauriola & Levin, 2001; Nowlis, Kahn, & Dhar, 2002), preference for actions or inactions (Baron & Ritov, 2004)…”
• Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. (2007, background): “McElroy and Seta (2003) found fewer framing errors among people with a more analytical/systematic processing style, suggesting that more systematic thinkers could better see through irrelevant differences between normatively equivalent problem framings.”
• Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities (2012, background): “Indeed, McElroy and Seta (2003) showed that the participants who adopt an analytical and presumably more thoughtful approach are less affected by risky choice framing.”