Direct versus Indirect Colonial Rule in India: Long-Term Consequences

By Lakshmi Shankar Iyer. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2010

349 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper compares economic outcomes across areas in India that were under direct British colonial rule with areas that were under indirect colonial rule. Controlling for selective annexation using a specific policy rule, I find that areas that experienced direct rule have significantly lower levels of access to schools, health centers, and roads in the postcolonial period. I find evidence that the quality of governance in the colonial period has a significant and persistent effect on postcolonial outcomes.

Subfields: Demography, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc640232e5dadee0b165dbd4041c89ead6f05ae1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

  1. Elias Papaioannou
  2. Daron Acemoglu
  3. James A. Robinson
  4. F. Gallego
  5. Christopher B. Barrett
  6. James Fenske
  7. Tarek A. Hassan
  8. N. Fuchs-Schündeln

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. James A. Robinson
  2. Daron Acemoglu
  3. F. Gallego
  4. Elias Papaioannou
  5. Tarek A. Hassan
  6. L. McBride
  7. Teevrat Garg
  8. Christopher B. Barrett

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Elias Papaioannou
  2. James A. Robinson
  3. Daron Acemoglu
  4. F. Gallego
  5. Christopher B. Barrett
  6. Teevrat Garg
  7. James Fenske
  8. L. McBride

Citations in the corpus