From processing efficiency to attentional control: a mechanistic account of the anxiety–performance relationship
By Mark R. Wilson. 2008
130 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc5af02cd07ff83c376900e120c20ebde611124e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- D. Hill
- S. Fleming
- Nicholas L. Matthews
- Samuel James Vine
- S. Hanton
- Mark R. Wilson
- Christopher Mesagno
- D. Fletcher
In Social Psychology
- D. Hill
- Samuel James Vine
- S. Fleming
- Nicholas L. Matthews
- S. Hanton
- Mark R. Wilson
- D. Fletcher
- Lee Crust
Citations in the corpus
- A qualitative exploration of choking in elite golf. (2010, background): “As a result, task-relevant information is processed at a slower rate and choking is said to occur unless the athlete responds with increased “effort” (Wilson, 2008; Wilson, Smith, & Holmes, 2007); however, high levels of anxiety and/or the completion of a cognitively demanding task under pressure ar”
- Choking in sport: a review (2010, background): “This is considered to be a result of the frequent and intense state anxiety response that athlete’s with high trait anxiety experience whilst under pressure, which overwhelms their working memory, causing processing inefficiency and encouraging choking (Wilson et al., 2007b; Wilson, 2008).”
- Quiet Eye Training: Effects on Learning and Performance Under Pressure (2010, background): “Anxiety has been shown to influence attentional control, and as a result, much research aimed at understanding the anxiety-performance relationship has focused on the underlying attentional mechanisms (see Janelle, 2002 ; Wilson, 2008 , for reviews).”