Firm Turnover in Imperfectly Competitive Markets

By M. Asplund, Volker Nocke. 2006

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc1d709b8d112adfa2f0dd35bb1216aa6a371468

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Firm Dynamics, Productivity Growth, and Job Creation in Developing Countries: The Role of Micro- and Small Enterprises (2015, unknown): “More recent approaches include those by Melitz (2003) and Asplund and Nocke (2006).”
Market Structure and Productivity: A Concrete Example (2004, unknown): “Interested readers can find formal existence and uniqueness proofs of similarly-styled equilibria—albeit with different assumptions regarding specifics of the demand and supply structures—in Asplund and Nocke (2003) and Melitz (2003).”
Market Size, Trade, and Productivity (2005, unknown): “We then present the open economy version of the 1This closed economy version of our model is related to Asplund and Nocke (2006), which analyzes rm dynamics in a closed economy.”
Assessing Job Flows Across Countries: The Role of Industry, Firm Size and Regulations (2006, unknown): “, Jovanovic [1982], Hopenhayn and Rogerson [1993], Melitz [2003], Asplund and Nocke [2006]) posit that new entrant firms do not know, ex ante, their productivity type and must pay an entry fee before learning their type. Firms enter the market until the expected present discounted value of profits f”
Monopolistic Competition: Beyond the Constant Elasticity of Substitution (2012, unknown): “This could be accomplished by using the research strategy implemented by Asplund and Nocke (2006), who investigated the ef fect of market size on firm turnover.”
What Determines Productivity (2011, unknown): “Environmental factors that shift the model’s exogenous parameters or the shape of the revenue function will change the minimum productivity level necessary for profitable operation, A, and the responsiveness of market share to productivity differences.”
Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability? (2008, unknown): “…industries as collections of heterogeneousproductivity producers and link producers’ productivity levels to their performance and survival in the industry (see, for example, Boyan Jovanovic (1982), Hugo A. Hopenhayn (1992), Richard Ericson and Ariel Pakes (1995), Marc J. Melitz (2003), and Marcus…”
Cross Country Differences in Job Reallocation: The Role of Industry, Firm Size and Regulations (2014, unknown): “Indeed, standard models of entry and exit (for example, Jovanovic (1982), Hopenhayn and Rogerson (1993), Melitz (2003), Asplund and Nocke (2006)) posit that new entrant firms do not know, ex ante, their productivity type and must pay an entry fee before learning their type.”
Trade Integration, Firm Selection and the Costs of Non-Europe (2006, background): “2Other related contributions include Asplund and Nocke (2005) as well as Bernard, Redding and Schott (2006).”
Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity under Firm Heterogeneity (2019, background): “2Pavcnik (2002); Asplund and Nocke (2006); Foster, Haltiwanger, and Krizan (2001); Melitz and Redding (2012).”
Prices, Spatial Competition, and Heterogenous Producers: An Empirical Test (2007, unknown): “Some additional models of selection among heterogeneous producers in an industry equilibrium (though not all are concerned with price effects) include Hopenhayn [1992], Melitz [2003] and Asplund and Nocke [2006]. 5 Empirical evidence suggests that producers do sink resources into entry before learni”