Consumption effects of genetic modification: what if consumers are right?

By K. Giannakas, M. Fulton. 2002

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc1ada4e791f8dfc9e4b15ef26cb68d8fac2fff6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. M. Qaim

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. M. Qaim

In Marketing

1. M. Qaim

Citations in the corpus

• The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops (2009, background): “Giannakas & Fulton (2002) and Lence & Hayes (2005) showed that labeling in general and segregation costs in particular can influence the welfare effects of GM crops significantly.”
• Consumer Benefits of Labels and Bans on GM Foods—Choice Experiments with Swedish Consumers (2007, unknown): “…maximizing measure, whether to have a voluntary or a mandatory label policy, depends on the proportion of reluctant versus indifferent consumers, expectations of compliance, the cost of labeling, and keeping the two alternatives separated (Giannakas and Fulton 2002; Crespi and Marette 2003).”