Myconet Volume 14. Part One. Outline of Ascomycota—2009. Part Two. Notes on Ascomycete Systematics. Nos. 4751–5113
By H. Lumbsch, S. Huhndorf. 2010
309 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cell Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbd28b9c5a7df19d9769f1a43d235dfffc099c89
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cell Biology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Steven Leavitt
- K. D. Hyde
- R. Lücking
- H. Thorsten Lumbsch
- Asha J. Dissanayake
- Ali H. Bahkali
- E. McKenzie
- A. Al‐Sadi
In Plant Science
- K. D. Hyde
- Steven Leavitt
- R. Lücking
- Asha J. Dissanayake
- R. Jeewon
- H. Thorsten Lumbsch
- E. McKenzie
- D. Bhat
Citations in the corpus
- The sooty moulds (2014, background): “( 2008 ) stated that it includes 26 genera and 117 species , although Lumbsch and Huhndorf ( 2010 ) accepted only 13 genera . circumscribed the family on the basis of ecological characters .”
- Towards a revised generic classification of lecanoroid lichens (Lecanoraceae, Ascomycota) based on molecular, morphological and chemical evidence (2016, background): “The family currently includes over 25 genera (Lumbsch and Huhndorf 2010) and about 770 described species (Jaklitsch et al. 2015).”
- The ranking of fungi: a tribute to David L. Hawksworth on his 70th birthday (2017, background): “…are being proposed continuously (e.g. Liew et al. 2000; McLaughlin et al. 2001a, b; Lutzoni et al. 2004; Taylor et al. 2004; Adl et al. 2005; Lumbsch and Huhndorf 2007, 2010; Hyde et al. 2013; Wijayawardene et al. 2014; Senanayake et al. 2015; Li et al. 2016; Maharachchikumbura et al. 2016).”
- Towards incorporating anamorphic fungi in a natural classification – checklist and notes for 2011 (2012, methodology): “A question mark before the entry means that its placement in that family or order is not fully established and generally follows Lumbsch & Huhndorf (2010).”
- Species in lichen-forming fungi: balancing between conceptual and practical considerations, and between phenotype and phylogenomics (2021, unknown): “2009, 2011, 2020; Lumbsch and Huhndorf 2010; Frisch et al.”
- Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota (2019, methodology): “In the Kingdom Fungi, the phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota cover around 97% of all fungal species (Willis 2018).”
- Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Graphostromataceae, Hypoxylaceae, Lopadostomataceae and Xylariaceae (2017, background): “Lumbsch and Huhndorf (2010) accepted 76 genera, while the most recent outline includes 87 genera in the family (Maharachchikumbura et al. 2016).”
- Fungal diversity notes 603–708: taxonomic and phylogenetic notes on genera and species (2017, methodology): “Based on these differences in morphological characteristics, Lumbsch and Huhndorf (2010) placed the genus in Xylariales genera incertae sedis and the same was followed by Maharachchikumbura et al. (2015, 2016).”
- Goodbye morphology? A paradigm shift in the delimitation of species in lichenized fungi (2011, background): “Within Ascomycota, lichen-forming fungi are found in five classes in the derived superclass Leotiomyceta, while the early-diverging subphyla Taphrinomycotina and Saccharomycotina, and the Pezizomycetes lack any lichenized taxa (Schoch et al. 2009; Lumbsch and Huhndorf 2010).”
- Microfungi on Tectona grandis (teak) in Northern Thailand (2016, background): “Tubeufiaceae M.E. Barr, Mycologia 71(5): 948 (1979) Tubeufiaceae was introduced in Pleosporales by Barr (1979) with Tubeufia as the generic type.”
- Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaena odorata (Siam weed) (2020, background): “The genus has been classified within the family Patellariaceae (Kutorga and Hawksworth 1997; Eriksson 2006; Lumbsch and Huhndorf 2010a, b).”
- The 2016 classification of lichenized fungi in the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota – Approaching one thousand genera (2016, methodology): “The genus was listed in Stictidaceae (Lumbsch & Huhndorf 2010) but suggested to form part of Phlyctidaceae by Miądlikowska et al. (2014).”
- The Xylariaceae as model example for a unified nomenclature following the “One Fungus-One Name” (1F1N) concept (2013, background): “Muscodor is, for instance, not listed among the valid genera of Xylariaceae compiled by Lumbsch and Huhndorf (2010), even though it was included in the Genera of Hyphomycetes by Seifert et al. (2011).”