Towards incorporating anamorphic fungi in a natural classification – checklist and notes for 2011

By Wijayawardene Dnn, M. Ehc, K. D. Hyde. 2012

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A complilation of anamorphic names for both Ascomycota and Basidiomycota is provided which comprises 2895 genera. The genera are listed against a backbone of teleomorphic relationships where known. The study reveals that 73 genera and 95 anamorph-like genera are linked to teleomorphic genera names, 447 genera (three anamorph-like genera) are linked to teleomorph families, orders or classes, while for more than 1592 (55%) genera no teleomorph link is known. The links are based on the literature and often because fungi were found in association, but have not been proven by molecular data. Many are based on links with species other than the generic type and thus must be considered questionable for the genus. A considerable effort is needed to establish whether these links are correct.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10f951eab7abddf1a6c6dd31c7894cad3b073ffb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Pestalotiopsis—morphology, phylogeny, biochemistry and diversity (2011, background): “One fifth of all known anamorphic fungi lack known sexual states (Shearer et al. 2007), and out of 2,873 anamorphic genera names, 699 genera and 94 anamorph-like genera are linked to a sexual state (Hyde et al. 2011).”
Outline of Ascomycota: 2017 (2018, unknown): “We used Lumbsch and Huhndorf (2010), Hyde et al. (2011), Wijayawardene et al. (2012, 2017a, b) and Jaklitsch et al. (2016a) to compile both asexual and sexual genera (and other higher taxonomic ranks) into a single outline.”
The Xylariaceae as model example for a unified nomenclature following the “One Fungus-One Name” (1F1N) concept (2013, background): “Amphispaeria umbrina AF009805 HKUCC 3175 Jaklitsch and Voglmayr (2012) Annulohypoxylon annulatum AM749938 MUCL 47218 P.”
Fungal diversity notes 491–602: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa (2017, unknown): “as coelomycetous and hyphomycetous (Hyde et al. 2011).”
Morpho-molecular characterization of microfungi associated with marine based habitats (2020, background): “Members of this genus are saprobes mostly in terrestrial or aquatic environments (Hyde et al. 2011), while D.”
Revision of lignicolous Tubeufiaceae based on morphological reexamination and phylogenetic analysis (2011, unknown): “…helicosporous, staurosporous or dictyosporous, belonging to Annellospermosporella, Aquaphila, Araneomyces, Guelichia, Helicoma, Helicoon, Helicomyces, Helicosporium, Kamalomyces, Monodictys-like, Pendulispora, Peziotrichum, Tetracrium, Titaea and Xenosporium (Hyde et al. 2011; Kirk et al. 2008).”
Refined families of Sordariomycetes (2020, background): “Wijayawardene et al. (2020) proposed to transfer this genus to Lasiosphaeriaceae from Sordariales genera incertae sedis based on phylogenetic analysis.”