Public Satisfaction With Police: The Importance of Procedural Justice and Police Performance in Police-Citizen Encounters

By Kristina Murphy. 2009

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbb7cec0980a755759f6922ea096815cb5d45c1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

In Political Science and International Relations

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Promoting trust in police: findings from a randomised experimental field trial of procedural justice policing (2014, unknown): “…showed that perceptions of procedural justice are particularly important to people who have had a police-initiated contact such as a police stop (Murphy 2009), and Bradford et al. (2009) also found correlational evidence suggesting positive encounters with police in the United Kingdom could…”
Examining macro-level impacts on procedural justice and police legitimacy (2012, background): “It is grounded in citizens’ perceptions, judgments, and opinions, and is influenced both by actual police behavior (Murphy, 2009a; Tyler & Folger, 1980) and by certain aspects of citizens’ personalities and dispositions (Piquero, Gomez-Smith, & Langton, 2004; Wolfe, 2011; see also Murphy, 2009b).”
The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: An Empirical Test of Core Theoretical Propositions (2011, background): “In sum, there is considerable empirical support for the theorized link between procedural justice and police legitimacy, and between police legitimacy and cooperation and compliance (e.g., Hinds & Murphy, 2007; Murphy, 2009; Murphy et al., 2009; Reisig et al., 2007; Sunshine & Tyler, 2003; Tyler, 20”
Community Perceptions of Police Body-Worn Cameras (2017, background): “…framework, or processbased model of legitimacy (Tyler, 2003, 2006; Tyler & Huo, 2002), and prior research (Brown & Benedict, 2002; Hinds & Murphy, 2007; kristina, 2009; Murphy, 2009), provide evidence of strong relationships between procedural justice and perceptions of police performance.”
Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence (2013, methodology): “Murphy (2009) also examined satisfaction with police in police–citizen encounters using these survey data.”
Procedural justice in contacts with the police: testing a relational model of authority in a mixed methods study (2011, unknown): “…nd ed so le ly fo r t he p er so na l u se o f t he in di vi du al u se r a nd is n ot to b e di ss em in at ed b ro ad ly . authority in citizen–police interactions (Hinds & Murphy, 2007; Murphy, 2009; Sunshine & Tyler, 2003a & b; Tyler, 2001, 2005, 2006; Tyler & Huo, 2002; Tyler & Wakslak, 2004).”
Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: The Benefits of Self-Regulation (2009, background): “Hence, increasing attention toward the ability to obtain voluntary deference and willing cooperation inevitably leads us to a concern about how to create and activate human values.”
Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: A Test of Measurement and Structure (2013, methodology): “This support persists even in the face of the multitude of sampling, operationalization, and statistical modeling methods that have been used (e.g., Murphy, 2009; Murphy, Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12103-013-9220-8) contains supplementary…”
Victim Willingness to Report Crime to Police: Does Procedural Justice or Outcome Matter Most? (2014, methodology): “Perception of police effectiveness was assessed, given that procedural justice literature has shown that willingness to cooperate with police can be shaped by both procedural justice concerns and views about whether the police perform their duties effectively (Murphy et al., 2008). The police effect”
Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and legal cynicism: a test for mediation effects (2015, unknown): “…– seem robust to empirical scrutiny (Dai, Frank, & Sun, 2011; Gau, 2011; Gau, Corsaro, Stewart, & Brunson, 2012; Kochel, Parks, & Mastrofski, 2013; Murphy, 2009; Murphy, Hinds, & Fleming, 2008; Reisig, Bratton, & Gertz, 2007; Reisig & Lloyd, 2009; Sunshine & Tyler, 2003; Tyler, 2006; but see…”