Handbook of Action Research Participative Inquiry and Practice

By Ian Alexander. European Journal of Information Systems, 2001

1,624 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbb76ba0f1aefe2e8ccc24dde580713675e33972

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Sundeep Sahay
2. Patricia Gayá Wicks
3. P. Reason
4. L. Goodman
5. J. Helms
6. E. Schein
7. B. Liang
8. L. Ferkins

Citations in the corpus

• Networks of Action: Sustainable Health Information Systems Across Developing Countries (2004, background): “(Gustavsen 2001, p. 20, emphasis added) Hence, the emphasis on scale through a focus on networks is not so much about size as facilitating the necessary learning processes for sustainability (Elden and Chisholm 1993, p. 293).”
• From Brainwashing to Organizational Therapy: A Conceptual and Empirical Journey in Search of ‘Systemic’ Health and a General Model of Change Dynamics. A Drama in Five Acts (2006, background): “…I came to call the ‘clinical perspective’ in emphasizing data that surfaced not by passive observation, as would be the case in ethnography, but by responding to requests for help in various ways and observing the reaction and impacts of different kinds of interventions (Schein 1987b, 1995, 2001b).”
• Training Counseling Psychologists as Social Justice Agents (2004, background): “For example, when researchers distance themselves from the lived, subjective experience of the research participants—as is mandated by positivist research methods—the result can be a distorted depiction of reality, one that is then described as “objective” (Gaventa & Cornwall, 2001).”
• Methods in Community-Based Participatory Research for Health (2005, background): “…1992; Kemmis & McTaggart, 2000; Park, 1993; Tandon, 1996), “participatory action research” (Whyte, 1991), “action research” (Peters & Robinson, 1984; Reason & Bradbury, 2001; Stringer, 1996), “participatory feminist research” (Maguire, 1987), “action science/inquiry” (Argyris, Putnam, &…”
• Good Boards Are Strategic: What Does That Mean for Sport Governance? (2012, methodology): “NSO research sites were deliberately selected by the research team based on: willingness and ability to engage in the proposed research (Reason & Bradbury, 2001), logistical considerations (e.g., proximity and access; Tolich & Davidson, 1999), high experience levels of the phenomena under study…”
• Initiating action research (2009, background): “Communicative space in first-, second- and third-person practice We have elsewhere (Reason & Bradbury, 2001b, 2008; Reason & Torbert, 2001) suggested that it is helpful to see three broad pathways for action research practice: first-person in personal reflective practice, second-person in relation…”