From Nothing Works to What Works: Changing Professional Ideology in the 21st Century

By F. Cullen, P. Gendreau. 2001

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Rehabilitation: Beyond Nothing Works (2013, background): “Explicit calls also have been made to make criminal justice policy and practice, including corrections, evidence-based (Sherman 1998; Cullen and Gendreau 2000; MacKenzie 2000, 2006; Cullen, Myer, and Latessa 2009).”
Can we avoid reductionism in risk reduction? (2017, background): “…and Bonta has inspired new optimism within the field of criminal justice scholarship and practice that certain highrisk individuals can benefit from interventions focused on these “Big Four” risk factors (Cullen, 2011; Cullen and Gendreau, 2001; Gendreau et al., 2004; Lowenkamp et al., 2006).”
An Intensive Supervision Program That Worked: Service Delivery, Professional Orientation, and Organizational Supportiveness (2005, background): “Suffice it to say, the confluence of complex political and social events and professional issues in criminal justice led to a denigration of the rehabilitative ideal (Cullen & Gendreau, 2001).”
Beyond Correctional Quackery-Professionalism and the Possibility of Effective Treatment (2002, background): “Fortunately, there is a growing movement among criminologists to do our part both in discerning the principles of effective intervention and in deciphering what interventions have empirical support (Cullen and Gendreau, 2001; MacKenzie, 2000; Welsh and Farrington, 2001).”
Is the PCL-R Really the “Unparalleled” Measure of Offender Risk? (2002, background): “We contend that the reason for this is simple: discipline ethnocentrism (see also Cullen & Gendreau, 2001).”