DeepSurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network

By Jared Katzman, Uri Shaham, A. Cloninger, Jonathan Bates, Tingting Jiang, Yuval Kluger. 2016

1,801 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundMedical practitioners use survival models to explore and understand the relationships between patients’ covariates (e.g. clinical and genetic features) and the effectiveness of various treatment options. Standard survival models like the linear Cox proportional hazards model require extensive feature engineering or prior medical knowledge to model treatment interaction at an individual level. While nonlinear survival methods, such as neural networks and survival forests, can inherently model these high-level interaction terms, they have yet to be shown as effective treatment recommender systems.MethodsWe introduce DeepSurv, a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network and state-of-the-art survival method for modeling interactions between a patient’s covariates and treatment effectiveness in order to provide personalized treatment recommendations.ResultsWe perform a number of experiments training DeepSurv on simulated and real survival data. We demonstrate that DeepSurv performs as well as or better than other state-of-the-art survival models and validate that DeepSurv successfully models increasingly complex relationships between a patient’s covariates and their risk of failure. We then show how DeepSurv models the relationship between a patient’s features and effectiveness of different treatment options to show how DeepSurv can be used to provide individual treatment recommendations. Finally, we train DeepSurv on real clinical studies to demonstrate how it’s personalized treatment recommendations would increase the survival time of a set of patients.ConclusionsThe predictive and modeling capabilities of DeepSurv will enable medical researchers to use deep neural networks as a tool in their exploration, understanding, and prediction of the effects of a patient’s characteristics on their risk of failure.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Su-In Lee
  2. Scott M. Lundberg
  3. Bryan Lim
  4. Gabriel Erion-Barner
  5. Hugh Chen
  6. Lev V. Utkin
  7. Egor D. Satyukov
  8. Andrei V. Konstantinov

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Lev V. Utkin
  2. Egor D. Satyukov
  3. Andrei V. Konstantinov
  4. Bryan Lim
  5. Chandan K. Reddy
  6. Mihaela van der Schaar
  7. Jianye Han
  8. Yan Li

Citations in the corpus