Simple Mail Transfer Protocol

By J. Klensin. Request for Comments, 2001

850 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb86a71a965bc0ea863b5cbd5a8e275a68adfe30

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. George Danezis
2. Nick Mathewson
3. Roger Dingledine
4. Chuanxiong Guo
5. Alexey Melnikov
6. Alf Zugenmaier
7. Wenbo Mao
8. Daniel R. Simon

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Chuanxiong Guo
2. Alexey Melnikov
3. George Danezis
4. Alf Zugenmaier
5. Wenbo Mao
6. Daniel R. Simon
7. Helen J. Wang
8. Nick Mathewson

Citations in the corpus

• Modern Cryptography: Theory and Practice (2003, methodology): “For exposition clarity, we have only presented the data field in "Upper-layer fields" and omitted the processing protocol specification (the omitted protocol specification in this case is "SMTP" which stands for simple mail transfer protocol [164]).”
• Mixminion: design of a type III anonymous remailer protocol (2003, methodology): “Unlike remailer Types I and II that used SMTP [33] (ordinary Internet e-mail) as their underlying transport mechanism, Mixminion clients and nodes communicate using a forward secure encrypted channel based on TLS [10].”
• Shield: vulnerability-driven network filters for preventing known vulnerability exploits (2004, methodology): “We have also examined some other protocols such as RTP [36] and SMTP [ 17 ] during the design of our policy language.”
• The WebSocket Protocol (2011, methodology): “This protocol is intended to fail to establish a connection with servers of pre-existing protocols like SMTP [RFC5321] and HTTP, while allowing HTTP servers to opt-in to supporting this protocol if desired.”