A representative, highly informative ’genotyping set’ of barley SSRs

By M. Macaulay, L. Ramsay, W. Powell, R. Waugh. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2001

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb427160244c294240607664f869d41af8bf57dc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. D. Bandelj
2. B. Javornik
3. J. Jakše
4. K. Chabane
5. Fred van Eeuwijk

In Plant Science

1. R. Niks
2. D. Bandelj
3. B. Javornik
4. J. Jakše
5. K. Chabane
6. Fred van Eeuwijk
7. H. Agrama
8. G. Eizenga

Citations in the corpus

• Linkage Disequilibrium Mapping of Morphological, Resistance, and Other Agronomically Relevant Traits in Modern Spring Barley Cultivars (2005, methodology): “For those cultivars in our set that had also been genotyped for SSR markers by other authors (Ramsay et al. 2000; Russell et al. 2000; Macaulay et al. 2001 ), the size of amplification products was in agreement with those reports.”
• Application of multiplex-ready PCR for fluorescence-based SSR genotyping in barley and wheat (2008, background): “This optimization is required because SSRs are frequently amplified with different efficiencies in conventional PCR (Macaulay et al. 2001).”
• Mapping and validation of the genes for resistance to Pyrenophora teres f. teres in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) (2003, unknown): “SSR markers used in this study generally had high levels of polymorphic information content in a study of European barley germplasm (Macaulay et al. 2001).”
• Microsatellite diversity in tetraploid Gossypium germplasm: assembling a highly informative genotyping set of cotton SSRs (2006, background): “…markers is expected to increase the efficiency of genetic diversity assessment and variety identification (Diwan and Cregan 1997; Song et al. 1999; Macaulay et al. 2001; Masi et al. 2003; Jain et al. 2004), fast characterization of aneuploid plant material (Ahoton et al. 2003), the genetic and…”
• EST versus Genomic Derived Microsatellite Markers for Genotyping Wild and Cultivated Barley (2005, methodology): “Twelve genomic primers were selected from mapped barley SSRs (Macaulay et al. 2001).”
• Assessment of genetic variability of olive varieties by microsatellite and AFLP markers (2004, background): “However, successful utilisation of known microsatellite markers requires prior information on the characteristics of the particular locus, since not all microsatellites are equal (Macaulay et al., 2001).”