Constraints on recovery: using molecular methods to study connectivity of aquatic biota in rivers and streams

By J. Hughes. 2007

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb28f37a203e74970f872cae6edcd5a5c39cf9a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Heino
2. Julian D. Olden
3. David L. Strayer
4. N. Bonada
5. Luis Mauricio Bini
6. T. Datry
7. T. Erős
8. J. Soininen

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Heino
2. Julian D. Olden
3. T. Erős
4. J. Soininen
5. N. Bonada
6. T. Datry
7. Luis Mauricio Bini
8. K. Boersma

Citations in the corpus

• Cryptic biodiversity loss linked to global climate change (2011, background): “Dispersal of immature stages (eggs, larvae and pupae) of aquatic insects is often accidental or passive and usually restricted to within-stream movement, whereas dispersal among streams or catchments happens during the winged adult life stage”
• Biological Diversity in Headwater Streams (2019, background): “Dispersal is limited within stream networks [90], and headwaters may be isolated by distances down to tributaries and then back up to other headwaters [14].”
• Dispersal strength determines meta‐community structure in a dendritic riverine network (2015, background): “constrained by flow connectivity (Fausch et al., 2002; Hughes, 2007; Schick & Lindley, 2007).”
• Genes in Streams: Using DNA to Understand the Movement of Freshwater Fauna and Their Riverine Habitat (2009, background): “In a recent review of studies on a wide range of stream taxa, Hughes (2007) revealed a trend showing greater genetic structure among populations of “upland” (more than 400 meters above sea level) as opposed to lowland species.”
• Integrating dispersal proxies in ecological and environmental research in the freshwater realm (2017, background): “These include 207 population genetics (Hughes, 2007), DNA-barcoding (Cristescu 2014) and environmental 208 Page 10 of 70 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/er-pubs Environmental Reviews Draft 11 DNA (Bohmann et al. 2014).”
• Slow, but steady: dispersal of freshwater molluscs (2011, background): “However, assessment and quantification of dispersal capability are difficult because the hypothetical dispersal capability may not reflect actual dispersal (Hughes 2007).”
• How river structure and biological traits influence gene flow: a population genetic study of two stream invertebrates with differing dispersal abilities (2012, background): “Such studies have already been conducted on a range of freshwater organisms (Watts et al., 2004; Finn et al., 2006; Hughes, 2007; Leclerc et al., 2008).”
• Using landscape ecology to understand and manage freshwater mussel populations (2008, methodology): “An approach like that used by Hughes (2007) might be useful for measuring patterns in connectivity.”
• Species diversity of insects in Japan: Their origins and diversification processes (2017, background): “Hughes JM (2007) Constraints on recovery: using molecular methods to study connectivity of aquatic biota in rivers and streams. Freshwater Biology 52, 616–631. Hughes JM, Schmidt DJ, Finn DS (2009) Genes in streams: using DNA to understand the movement of freshwater fauna and their riverine habitat.”
• Small but mighty: headwaters are vital to stream network biodiversity at two levels of organization (2011, background): “A hypothesis of greater b diversity in headwaters than in mid-order streams has not been addressed directly, but some evidence supports the idea within limited biogeographical regions (Finn and Poff 2005, Hughes 2007).”