Dispersal strength determines meta‐community structure in a dendritic riverine network
By M. Cañedo‐Argüelles, K. Boersma, M. Bogan, Julian D. Olden, Ivan C. Phillipsen, Tiffany A. Schriever, David A. Lytle. 2015
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47e49304d03a2f401589ceca0fcb68843dafaf74
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Integrating dispersal proxies in ecological and environmental research in the freshwater realm (2017, background): “…tool to identify these routes for all types of species, from poor 691 to strong dispersers, and therefore provide insights to ecosystem managers for designing 692 restoration and conservation projects (Tonkin et al. 2014; Cañedo-Arguelles et al. 2015; 693 Kärnä et al. 2015; Datry et al. 2016a).”
- The role of dispersal in river network metacommunities: Patterns, processes, and pathways (2018, background): “All rights reserved landscape curvature) (Canedo-Arguelles et al., 2015; Razeng et al., 2016), as has incorporating 555 flow directionality into watercourse distances (Padial et al., 2014), but again it appears to be 556 strongly context dependent (Campbell, 2010).”