Innovation and the Survival of New Firms in the UK

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship (2017, unknown): “The prevailing view in the empirical literature appears to be that there is a positive association between firms’ innovativeness and their subsequent survival (Audretsch 1995; Arrighetti and Vivarelli 1999; Helmers and Rogers 2010; Wagner and Cockburn 2010).”
Does innovativeness reduce startup survival rates (2015, background): “Helmers and Rogers (2010) study a cohort of UK-based limited liability companies established in 2001 and ﬁ nd that owning intellectual property is positively associated with survival.”
To be born is not enough: the key role of innovative start-ups (2016, unknown): “For example, Audretsch (1991) adopts a logit model on survival rates, while Helmers and Rogers (2010) implement a probit model on the probability of firm’s exit.”
What do we know about entrepreneurial finance and its relationship with growth? (2015, background): “However, the contrast between the experience of the United Kingdom and that of the United States suggests that the growth of a VC industry to support SME financing is not guaranteed (Wright et al., 2005).”