In vitro inhibition of soil microorganisms by 2-phenylethyl isothiocyanate

By B. J. Smith, J. Kirkegaard. 2002

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/baf2912a912bab1236bfb2bbd5b11fc2d0e98164

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

1. J. Gershenzon
2. Atle M. Bones
3. N. V. van Dam
4. S. Textor
5. B. Halkier
6. M. Watt
7. J. Kirkegaard
8. J. Passioura

In Plant Science

1. E. S. Jensen
2. Atle M. Bones
3. N. V. van Dam
4. M. Watt
5. J. Gershenzon
6. J. Kirkegaard
7. J. Passioura
8. S. Textor

Citations in the corpus

• Rhizosphere biology and crop productivity—a review (2006, background): “…graminmis, Ggt) were highly sensitive to the ITCs released by canola roots, whether in a pure form applied in Petri dish agar (Sarwar et al. 1998; Smith and Kirkegaard 2002), or when canola root tissues were added to soil at rates likely to be present in the field (Smith et al. 1999).”
• Residual nitrogen contribution from grain legumes to succeeding wheat and rape and related microbial process (2003, background): “Smith and Kirkegaard (2002) found that bacteria were generally more tolerant against isothiocyanates than the eukaryotic group, although both groups showed considerable variability in response.”
• Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. (2006, background): “In light of the many reports demonstrating the toxicity of glucosinolate hydrolysis products to bacteria and fungi in vitro (20, 113, 148), glucosinolates might be expected to defend plants against pathogens.”
• Defence mechanisms of Brassicaceae: implications for plant-insect interactions and potential for integrated pest management. A review (2010, background): “Smith and Kirkegaard (2002) tested the e ff ect of 2-phenylethyl isothiocyanate under in vitro conditions towards a range of fungi, oomycetes and bacteria.”
• Herbivore induction of the glucosinolate–myrosinase defense system: major trends, biochemical bases and ecological significance (2008, background): “These increases are not surprising in light of the fact that glucosinolates are also considered as defenses against some microorganisms, especially nectrotrophs (Li et al. 1999; Mari et al. 2002; Smith and Kirkegaard 2002).”
• Root and shoot glucosinolates: a comparison of their diversity, function and interactions in natural and managed ecosystems (2008, background): “in canola rhizospheres (Kirkegaard et al. 2004), which has been shown to be highly tolerant of 2PE-ITC in vitro ( Smith and Kirkegaard 2002 ).”