The “ventriloquist effect”: Visual dominance or response bias?

By C. S. Choe, R. Welch, Robb M. Gilford, James F. Juola. 1975

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Alternatively, however, one might imagine that such a unity effect was simply a result of response bias induced by the presence of the congruent visual signal instead (see Choe et al., 1975; Bertelson and Radeau, 1981).”
Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception (2007, background): “Numerous experimental studies have analyzed this kind of auditory-visual cue integration and found situations in which the cues are combined and situations in which they are processed separately [2,3,7,8,10,15,25–27].”
Towards a general law of numerical/object identity. Commentary. Author's reply (2001, background): “In other conditions, one signal train is delayed with respect to the other (Choe et al., 1975; Radeau and Bertelson, 1977).”
Unifying multisensory signals across time and space (2004, unknown): “J. A. Schirillo Psychology Department, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA sleben 1998; Bertelson and Radeau 1981; Choe et al. 1975; Hairston et al. 2003; Jack and Thurlow 1973; Lewald and Guski 2003; Lewald et al. 2001; Pick et al. 1969; Radeau and Bertelson 1987; Slutsky and…”
Knowledge about a Common Source Can Promote Visual — Haptic Integration (2007, background): “…similarity between the bimodal sensory input, such as the degree of temporal synchrony (eg Choe et al 1975; Jack and Thurlow 1973; Klemm 1909; Radeau and Bertelson 1977, 1987; Thomas 1941) or the amount of spatial separation (eg Bertelson and Radeau 1981; Choe et al 1975; Thurlow and Jack 1973).”