Towards a general law of numerical/object identity. Commentary. Author's reply
By Felice L. Bedford, Paul Bertelson, Jean H. M. Vroomen, Gisa Aschersleben, B. de Gelder, P. Bloom, Ken Cheng, Leon Cohen, D. Cunningham, Christopher Gauker and 10 more. 2001
45 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Charles Spence
- Yi-Chuan Chen
- Jess Hartcher-O'Brien
- Alberto Gallace
- Camille Koppen
- Benedikt Krings
- Hannah B. Helbig
- Marc O. Ernst
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Hence, they will be more likely to bind the inputs into a single multisensory object/event representation (see Bedford, 2001).”
- When vision ‘extinguishes’ touch in neurologically-normal people: extending the Colavita visual dominance effect (2008, background): “, those that can be deWned without reference to a particular sensory modality, such as size, shape, location, intensity, and temporal characteristics) that they share (Bedford 2001).”
- Audiovisual multisensory integration (2007, background): “The binding versus segregation of unimodal stimuli (what Bedford [3]”
- Knowledge about a Common Source Can Promote Visual — Haptic Integration (2007, result): “For instance, the size or shape of an object can be judged on the basis of visual as well as haptic cues. When the object is simultaneously seen and touched, the brain integrates the redundant sources of information across sensory modalities to come up with the most reliable estimate (Ernst and Bank”