ErmineJ: Tool for functional analysis of gene expression data sets

By Homin K. Lee, William Braynen, Kiran Keshav, Paul Pavlidis. BMC Bioinformatics, 2005

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundIt is common for the results of a microarray study to be analyzed in the context of biologically-motivated groups of genes such as pathways or Gene Ontology categories. The most common method for such analysis uses the hypergeometric distribution (or a related technique) to look for "over-representation" of groups among genes selected as being differentially expressed or otherwise of interest based on a gene-by-gene analysis. However, this method suffers from some limitations, and biologist-friendly tools that implement alternatives have not been reported.ResultsWe introduce ErmineJ, a multiplatform user-friendly stand-alone software tool for the analysis of functionally-relevant sets of genes in the context of microarray gene expression data. ErmineJ implements multiple algorithms for gene set analysis, including over-representation and resampling-based methods that focus on gene scores or correlation of gene expression profiles. In addition to a graphical user interface, ErmineJ has a command line interface and an application programming interface that can be used to automate analyses. The graphical user interface includes tools for creating and modifying gene sets, visualizing the Gene Ontology as a table or tree, and visualizing gene expression data. ErmineJ comes with a complete user manual, and is open-source software licensed under the Gnu Public License.ConclusionThe availability of multiple analysis algorithms, together with a rich feature set and simple graphical interface, should make ErmineJ a useful addition to the biologist's informatics toolbox. ErmineJ is available from http://microarray.cu.genome.org.

Subfields: Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bab4ed5c0fef4286ab5cb511f9da6f6f765e938f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. Danzhi Huang
  2. Richard A. Lempicki
  3. Brad T. Sherman
  4. Mark Stitt
  5. Robert M. Stephens
  6. Alisdair R. Fernie
  7. Björn Usadel
  8. Reinhard Schneider

Citations in the corpus