A survey of Demand Responsive Transport in Great Britain

By Lisa Davison, Marcus P. Enoch, T. Ryley, Mohammed A. Quddus, Chao Wang. 2012

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Ever since the 1970s, Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) has been promoted as a transport solution in circumstances where more traditional services are not economically viable, although so far a range of barriers has prevented its widespread adoption. More recently, new developments in operational and vehicle technology, coupled with significant cuts to public transport subsidy budgets, promote a willingness to explore ‘institutionally challenging’ options such as integrating transport provision across a range of different sectors. This has once more pushed the DRT concept forward as a possible option for saving money whilst retaining opportunities for accessibility.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Building and Construction, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba73b81fe5225014781d4b7aefd35e27f04a6e15

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

In Building and Construction

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Investigating the contribution of Demand Responsive Transport to a sustainable local public transport system (2014, background): “An operator survey, conducted in 2011, shows the recent state of play regarding the delivery (i.e. the supply) of DRT systems in Great Britain (Davison, Enoch, Ryley, Quddus, & Wang, 2014).”
Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco (2016, background): “, Wright and Curtis (2005)); it falls into broader, more familiar categories, such as paratransit (Cervero, 1997) and demand-responsive or flexible transport (Brake et al., 2007; Davison et al., 2014).”