The History of Economic Analysis

By Aleksei Savatyugin. 2002

1,810 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba71dea7d5c4b0ca00c28d0e175d339a26b922b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Meanings of methodological individualism (2007, background): “Hence an explanatory ‘division of labor’ existed between the ‘pure theory’ of economics, and other scientific approaches (Schumpeter 1954: 889).”
Services in Society and Academic Thought: An Historical Analysis (2005, background): “He is credited with the view that services are not valuable.”
II. THE MODELS OF ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROCESSES A Mathematical Model of Juglar Cycles and the Current Global Crisis (2010, positive): “of equilibrium level (as in Schumpeter's [1939] theory) defines the long-term trajectory of economic development, in the course of which economic system is in a dynamic equilibrium.”
The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism (2009, methodology): “As a result labour was considered as an invariant unit for measuring value and could, in theory, be used as a numeraire (Schumpeter & Joseph, 1978) as cited by Farber, Costanza, and Wilson (2002).”
Personality Psychology and Economics (2011, neutral): “, Schumpeter [1954]. 51 See Hicks [1946].”
HOW EVOLUTIONARY IS SCHUMPETER'S THEORY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT? (2002, background): “The concept of evolution is an offspring of late 18th and early 19th century debates within philosophy and the social sciences (cf. Schumpeter 1954: Part III, Chap.”
Speaking to the people? Money, trust, and central bank legitimacy in the age of quantitative easing (2016, background): “This ‘myth of banks as institutions of intermediation’ (Polillo, 2013: 33–7), while always a misrepresentation (Schumpeter, 1954: 1079–80), has proved astonishingly persistent and continues to be ‘firmly entrenched in the contemporary imaginary’ (Sgambati, 2016: 276).”