Dialogue on `Institutional complementarity and political economy`

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

From comparing capitalisms to the politics of institutional change (2008, background): “However, functional interdependence between various domains may relate to multiple dimensions of economic exchange (Crouch et al., 2005), and the complementarities between domains subject to different political and social dynamics.”
Flexicurity: A conceptual critique (2011, methodology): “Our second issue concerns institutional complementarity, an increasingly popular concept in neo-institutional analysis and political economy which is used in a variety of ways in the literature (Crouch et al., 2005; Höpner, 2005).”
An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities (2008, unknown): “In particular, corporate governance may have potential trade-offs in terms of different aspects of effectiveness and firm performance (Crouch et al. 2005).”
How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity (2006, unknown): “However, should too much emphasis be placed on the coherence and complementarities among institutions, the degree of stability could be overestimated (Crouch et al. 2005).”
Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety (2007, background): “As suggested above, the costs and benefits of different institutional combinations are not static, but evolve with the capacities of actors (Crouch et al. 2005).”