Corporate Accountability Reporting and High-Profile Misconduct

By Dane M. Christensen. 2016

290 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba504064c8d5d9c2151cb34bdf458eee9678cad4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2019, background): “…or society at large (Godfrey et al. 2009; Hoepner et al. 2019); around corporate scandals and high-profile misconduct (Janney and Gove 2011; Christensen 2016); after inadvertent (non-fraudulent) financial restatements (Bartov et al. 2020); following negative press coverage (Shiu and Yang…”
The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance (2017, unknown): “10 Examining the environmental disclosures of firms drawn from five high pollution industries in the US in 2003, Clarkson et al. (2008) observe a positive relationship between environmental performance and environmental disclosure, consistent with the signalling hypothesis under the umbrella of econ”
Where's the greenium? (2019, unknown): “Our methodological approach is similar to that used in Crabbe and Turner (1995) and Schwert (2018).”
Corporate Social Responsibility Performance, Incentives, and Learning Effects (2020, background): “These findings suggest the symbolic role of CSR committees and CSR audits, and emphasize the reputational value of issuing public CSR reports as a form of voluntary contract between managers and stakeholders (Christensen 2016).”
Corporate Social Responsibility Report Narratives and Analyst Forecast Accuracy (2017, background): “In addition, CSR activities and disclosures motivate companies to improve their relationship with their stakeholders (Ioannou and Serafeim 2012; Christensen 2016).”
Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings (2021, methodology): “Some studies also use membership in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index, Calvert Index, and FTSE4Good Index as proxies for good ESG performance (e.g., Christensen 2016; Chatterji et al. 2016).”