Subjective norms and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate

By Paul E Etcheverry, C. Agnew. 2004

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9ba1425c9cb5032b2f8cbb6993b56536d6571da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. C. Rusbult
2. Jody L. Davis
3. Benjamin Le
4. X. Arriaga
5. A. Coy
6. C. Agnew
7. Xiang Li
8. J. Petrick

In Social Psychology

1. Benjamin Le
2. C. Agnew
3. C. Rusbult
4. X. Arriaga
5. Jody L. Davis
6. A. Coy
7. Sunday Samson Babalola
8. Paul E Etcheverry

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Coy
2. C. Rusbult
3. Benjamin Le
4. Jody L. Davis
5. X. Arriaga
6. C. Agnew
7. J. Petrick
8. Xiang Li

Citations in the corpus

• The Investment Model of Commitment Processes (2011, background): “Etcheverry and Agnew (2004) found that subjective norms provided additional prediction of relationship commitment, above and beyond the effects of satisfaction, alternatives, and past investments.”
• Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice (2011, background): “…could also explore the utility of applying alternative interpersonal commitment models to commitment to the environment (e.g., Johnson, Caughlin, & Huston’s [1999] moral component) or supplement the model with additional factors such as social network influence (e.g., Etcheverry & Agnew, 2004).”