APACHE—acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system

By Jack E. Zimmerman, D. Wagner, E. Draper, D. E. Lawrence. 1981

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A Provable Algorithm for Learning Interpretable Scoring Systems (2018, methodology): “Some other widely used medical scores are SAPS I, II, and III [10, 21] and APACHE I, II, III to assess intensive care units mortality risks [14], CHADS2 to assess the risk of stroke [9]; TIMI to estimate the risk of death of ischemic events [2].”
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis (2016, unknown): “Black 20 892 (14) 808 (10) 9552 (14) 777 (10) 9755 (15)”
Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock (2003, unknown): “Intermediate 99 (86) 105 (92) 6 (18) 9 (25) 105 (70) 114 (76)”
The fused lasso penalty for learning interpretable medical scoring systems (2017, unknown): “Some other widely used medical scores are SAPS I, II, and III [9], [17] and APACHE I, II, III to assess intensive care units mortality risks [13], CHADS2 to assess the risk of stroke [8]; TIMI to estimate the risk of death of ischemic events [1].”
Supersparse Linear Integer Models for Interpretable Classification (2013, background): “1 Related Work in Medicine Some popular medical scoring systems include: – SAPS I, II and III, to assess the mortality of patients in intensive care [40, 39, 49, 52]; – APACHE I, II and III, to assess the mortality of patients in intensive care [36, 34, 35]; – CHADS2, to assess the risk of stroke in”
A Bayesian Approach to Learning Scoring Systems (2015, methodology): “Some popular medical scoring systems include SAPS (Le Gall et al., 1984) and APACHE (Knaus et al., 1981) to assess ICU mortality risk, CHADS2 (Gage et al., 2001) to assess the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and TIMI (Antman et al., 2000) to assess the risk of death and ischemic ”
From vital signs to clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis: a machine learning basis for a clinical decision support system (2014, methodology): “Conversely, scoring systems such as the SOFA, 9 the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), 17 and Simpli ﬁ ed Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 18 have shown reasonable discrimination when classifying patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU into groups with high-risk and low-risk…”
Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. (2013, unknown): “Glasgow Coma Scale score, median (IQR) (n = 1326) 11 (3-15) (n = 1353) 11 (3-15)”