Dimensional reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models with finite rotations and energy‐based mesh sampling and weighting for computational efficiency
By Charbel Farhat, Philip Avery, Todd Chapman, Julien Cortial. 2014
372 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b97900b33f30c8ca3313786807a39e3350824992
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Charbel Farhat
- Christian Soize
- Philip Avery
- Stefano Mariani
- Matthew J. Zahr
- Todd Chapman
- Alberto Corigliano
- Dan Negrut
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Charbel Farhat
- Christian Soize
- Philip Avery
- Stefano Mariani
- Matthew J. Zahr
- Alberto Rodriguez
- F. Meier
- Jessica K. Hodgins
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Philip Avery
- Matthew J. Zahr
- Charbel Farhat
- Christian Soize
- Todd Chapman
- Alberto Corigliano
- Stefano Mariani
- Martino Dossi
Citations in the corpus
- Structure‐preserving, stability, and accuracy properties of the energy‐conserving sampling and weighting method for the hyper reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models (2015, methodology): “Most recently, an energy-based method was developed in [29, 30] for the hyper reduction of nonlinear FE dynamic models.”
- Model Order Reduction and domain decomposition strategies for the solution of the dynamic elastic–plastic structural problem (2015, positive): “…methods were developed using the Petrov–Galerkin projection for reducing the dimension of a discrete nonlinear dynamic computational model, see e.g. Hyper-reduction method [13,14], Gauss–Newton with Approximation Tensor (GNAT) method [14–16] or Discrete Empirical Interpolation (DEIM) method [9,17].”
- On the use of simulation in robotics: Opportunities, challenges, and suggestions for moving forward (2020, methodology): “The approach could be used to methodically reduce model (and therefore computational) complexity through systematic dimensional reduction and/or model compression (45, 46).”
- A nonparametric probabilistic approach for quantifying uncertainties in low‐dimensional and high‐dimensional nonlinear models (2017, methodology): “caveat is remedied by equipping an MOR method with a rigorous procedure for approximating the resulting reduced operators whose computational complexity scales only with the small size n of the ROM [2, 4, 13, 14].”
- A multilevel projection‐based model order reduction framework for nonlinear dynamic multiscale problems in structural and solid mechanics (2017, methodology): “Furthermore, the ECSW method distinguishes itself from alternative hyper reduction methods through its preservation of the Lagrangian structure associated with Hamilton’s principle.”