Scale‐dependence in species‐area relationships

By W. Turner, E. Tjørve. 2005

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b96c88a01e55ff2e81e7a969dfd298648dcf4eb0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Parameterization of biodiversity–productivity relationship and its scale dependency using georeferenced tree‐level data (2019, background): “Our findings were consistent with the positive association between species richness and the associated area, one of the best-known and most-studied patterns in ecology (Connor & Mccoy, 1979) termed as the species–area relationship (SAR, see Tjørve & Turner, 2009; Cazzolla Gatti et al., 2017).”
To Fit or Not to Fit? A Poorly Fitting Procedure Produces Inconsistent Results When the Species–Area Relationship is used to Locate Hotspots (2007, methodology): “…Maddux and Athreya (1999) considered invalid some assumptions of self-similarity, and various authors have shown that a power law can be scale dependent, so that at some scales the SAR should follow other models (e.g., He and Legendre 1996, 2002; Plotkin et al. 2000; Turner and Tjørve 2005).”
Assemblage‐level responses of phyllostomid bats to tropical forest fragmentation: land‐bridge islands as a model system (2008, background): “Furthermore, our study emphasizes the importance of considering both structural and functional connectivity in determining responses to fragmentation (e.g. Uezu et al., 2005; Henry et al., 2007).”
A flexible multi-scale approach for standardised recording of plant species richness patterns (2009, methodology): “As biodiversity is essentially a scale-dependent phenomenon (Reed et al., 1993; Peet et al., 1998; Turner and Tjørve, 2005), both”
SCALE AND HIERARCHY IN MACROEVOLUTION (2007, background): “…dominated by immigration ⁄ emigration dynamics to those dominated by true origination and extinction (for an array of rather different versions of this argument, see Preston 1960, 1962; Rosenzweig 1995, 2004, 2005; Hubbell 2001; Allen and White 2003; Turner and Tjørve 2005; Drakare et al. 2006).”
The island species–area relationship: biology and statistics (2012, background): “However, numerous biological mechanisms and theories have been proposed to explain features of ISARs (Whittaker & Fernández-Palacios, 2007, pp. 87–88; and see Schmida & Wilson, 1985; Rosenzweig, 1995; Turner & Tjørve, 2005).”
A spatial scale assessment of habitat effects on arthropod communities of an oceanic island (2009, background): “These arguments and others highlight the widely recognized view that spatial scale is of vital importance for understanding ecological patterns and processes (Whittaker et al., 2001; Rahbek, 2005; Turner and Tjørve, 2005).”