Dynamic effects of public investment: Vector autoregressive evidence from six industrialized countries

By Stefan Mittnik, Thorsten Neumann. 2001

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Macroeconomic Rates Of Return Of Public And Private Investment: Crowding-In And Crowding-Out Effects (2009, unknown): “Mittnik and Neumann (2001) 1 Musgrave (1939) discussed the appropriateness of financing via government debt, the so-called selfliquidating investments, which he critically considered to be limited.”
Public Capital and Growth (2010, background): “…investment Not significantly different from zero in steady state model; in transition model with IV also not significantly different from zero Mittnik & Neumann (2001) Canada, France, UK, Japan, The Netherlands and Germany Different periods per country (Q) Public investment VECM Weak…”
The Dynamic Effects of Public Capital: VAR Evidence for 22 OECD Countries (2005, unknown): “64 Note that the two studies that come closest to ours in scope, Mittnik and Neumann (2001) and Pereira (2001b), both use public investment as model variable whereas we use public capital.”
New Estimates of Government Net Capital Stocks for 22 OECD Countries 1960-2001 (2004, background): “autoregressive models (see, e.g., Mittnik and Neumann (2001) and Voss (2002)).”