The Dynamic Effects of Public Capital: VAR Evidence for 22 OECD Countries

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the economic effects of public infrastructure investment: A survey of the international evidence (2013, background): “…(see, for example, Bajo and Sosvilla, 1993, for Spain; Ligthart, 2002, for Portugal; Otto and Voss, 1994, 1996, for Australia; Sturm and de Haan, 1995, for the Netherlands; and Wang, 2004, for Canada; as well as multi-country studies by Aschauer, 1989c; Ford and Poret, 1991; and Kamps, 2005).”
Network Effects of Public Transport Infrastructure: Evidence on Italian Regions (2012, unknown): “Kamps (2005), for a group of OECD countries including Italy, find a positive long-run elasticity of public capital with respect to private capital, a negative effect on employment, and a positive albeit not significant effect on GDP.”
Transport infrastructure and long-run economic growth in OECD countries (2015, background): “…models which do not rely heavily on economic theory but analyse the relationships between several data series, including infrastructures and GDP (for cross-country studies see, Kamps, 2005; Ghani and Din, 2006; Guo et al., 2011 and for regional studies, Herranz-Loncán, 2007; Márquez et al., 2011).”
Infrastructure and Growth: Empirical Evidence (2009, methodology): “1999) or estimates of public capital (Kamps, 2005), are often assumed to be the effects of infrastructure on growth or output levels.”