Survey Incentives: Cash vs. In-Kind; Face-to-Face vs. Mail; Response Rate vs. Nonresponse Error

By Erica P Ryu, Mick Couper, R. Marans. 2006

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b953e63b32bd9ae8acd2e0edaea313cff35fcefd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Peter Lynn
2. E. Singer
3. Cong Ye
4. Faizan Ali
5. Kisang Ryu
6. J. Brick

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Peter Lynn
2. E. Singer
3. Cong Ye
4. Faizan Ali
5. Kisang Ryu
6. J. Brick
7. Heesup Han
8. Jacinta M. Gau

In Statistics and Probability

1. E. Singer
2. Cong Ye
3. Kisang Ryu
4. J. Brick

Citations in the corpus

• The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys (2013, background): “…articles and research notes reporting incentive experiments in mail surveys (for example, Cockayne and Torgerson 2005; Dirmaier et al. 2007; Doody et al. 2003; Keating et al. 2008; Kenyon et al. 2005; Leung et al. 2004; ryu, Couper, and Marans 2006; Sharp et al. 2006; Teisl, roe, and Vayda 2005).”
• Response Rates In Hospitality Research: An Overview of Current Practice and Suggestions For Future Research (2020, background): “As per the literature, the improvement of response rate via incentives differ in different situations (Ryu et al., 2006).”
• The use of respondent incentives on longitudinal surveys (2008, background): “Couper et al (2006) found that the higher response rates produced by the cash and non-cash”