Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world

By Leysia Palen, Paul Dourish. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2003

1,150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9539f645b07d7995b20387ae4385f84404ecda4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

Friends only: examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in facebook (2010, background): “Dourish and Anderson situate privacy as an information practice [14].”
PEIR, the personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research (2009, background): “Location tracking can also create chilling effects on legal but socially stigmatized activities [45, 46, 47].”
Systematic review of smartphone-based passive sensing for health and wellbeing (2017, background): “Most studies addressed data security via secure transmission or encryption, but future studies must also tackle other privacy issues, for example, those related to the third-party use of personal data or storage of data in databanks not controlled by device users [85].”
Strategies and struggles with privacy in an online social networking community (2008, background): “Participating in a social community requires the sharing and disclosure of personal information [17].”
Leakiness and creepiness in app space: perceptions of privacy and mobile app use (2014, background): “Altman’s notions of personal space and territoriality Irwin Altman’s theory of privacy regulation has been discussed in prior work [34].”
User interfaces for privacy agents (2006, background): “… Surveys have repeatedly shown that most people take a pragmatic approach to privacy, making contextual decisions about whether to protect their privacy or take actions that might put their privacy at risk [Ackerman et al. 1999; Harris et al. 1991, 1998; Palen and Dourish 2003; Sheehan 2002].”
Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks (2013, background): “Users must balance an interest in sharing with a need to keep some parts of their life private [2, 30].”
Moving beyond untagging: photo privacy in a tagged world (2010, background): “For this domain, we deﬁne privacy as a process of boundary management [3]; individuals alter their behavior to disclose or withhold information in order to manage their identity and allegiances with others over time [14].”
Personal privacy through understanding and action: five pitfalls for designers (2004, methodology): “Users had to think explicitly about privacy in the abstract—and instruct the system to model an external representation of their privacy practices—instead of managing privacy intuitively through their actions in situ [3].”
Understanding mobile contexts (2003, background): “Even if the phenomena of space claiming and privacy in social interactions have been recognized in the field of social psychology decades ago, they have emerged as research topics in the HCI area only recently [23, 24].”
Urban sensing systems: opportunistic or participatory? (2008, result): “On the other hand, studies by Palen and Do urish [14] and Lederer, et al [15] argue that a priori configuration of applications that disclose private informa tion will usually not work given the dynamics of life.”
The Third Wave?: Inclusive Privacy and Security (2017, neutral): “There are many conceptualizations of privacy [8, 37, 69, 72, 83–85].”
Expectation and purpose: understanding users' mental models of mobile app privacy through crowdsourcing (2012, background): “Palen and Dourish [30] and Barth et al. [4] discussed how expectations are governed by norms, past experiences, and technologies.”