The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance

By K. Rennings, Andreas Ziegler, K. Ankele, E. Hoffmann. 2006

636 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b938329c53490f78bb61e5c358bb8ab61f7cb2e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Environmental Innovations, Local Networks and Internationalization (2012, background): “Among the others, see Cleff and Rennings (1999), Rennings (2000), Brunnermeier and Cohen (2003), Rennings et al. (2004, 2006), Wagner (2006, 2007a, 2007b, 2008), Horbach (2008), Johnstone and Labonne (2009), Ziegler and Nogareda (2009), Horbach and Oltra (2010) and Kesidou and Pemirel (2010).”
A Survey of the Literature on Environmental Innovation Based on Main Path Analysis (2016, neutral): “Instead, Rennings et al. (2006) choose to focus only on EMAS-certified firms and analyze how different characteristics of the environmental management scheme – mainly, its maturity, its strategic importance, and its learning processes – affect EI adoption.”
Determinants of Eco-innovations by Type of Environmental Impact: The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market Pull (2012, background): “The importance of environmental management systems for ecoinnovations has been shown by Rennings et al. (2006), Rehfeld et al. (2007), Wagner (2008) and Khanna et al. (2009).”
Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs—An empirical analysis based on energy audit data from Germany (2012, background): “…on the adoption of EEMs, since energy management systemsshould help to overcome barriers related to lack of information and the lack of time for the implementing of EEMs(Horbach 2008; Rennings et al. 2006), and may also be seen as an indicator ofa firm‟s commitment to improve energy efficiency.”
The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries (2015, background): “One of the few stylized facts to have emerged, albeit still in a non-systematic way (e.g., Florida, 1996; Oltra and Saint Jean, 2005a,b; Rennings and Rammer, 2009), is that EIs require knowledge inputs from different and heterogeneous sources, possibly more so than other innovations (Horbach et…”
Drivers and barriers of eco-innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective (2018, background): “Different types of EI have been mentioned in the literature, including process versus product EIs (Belin, Horbach, & Oltra, 2011; Rave, Goetzke, & Larch, 2011; Rehfeld et al., 2007; Rennings et al., 2006) and radical versus incremental EIs (Del Río et al.”
Effects of Eco-Innovation on Economic and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Turkey’s Manufacturing Companies (2020, background): “[11] and Lee and Min [14] found that eco-innovation has a positive effect on financial performance.”
The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China (2018, background): “EMS can be understood as environmental organizational capabilities, which assist a firm in achieving successful implementation of eco-innovation (e.g., Blind, 2012; Rehfeld et al., 2006; Rennings et al., 2006; Wagner, 2008).”