Diets with High or Low Protein Content and Glycemic Index for Weight-Loss Maintenance

By T. Larsen, S. Dalskov, M. van Baak, S. Jebb, A. Papadaki, A. Pfeiffer, J. A. Martínez, T. Handjieva-Darlenska, M. Kunesova, M. Pihlsgård and 4 more. New England Journal of Medicine, 2010

808 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background Studies of weight-control diets that are high in protein or low in glycemic index have reached varied conclusions, probably owing to the fact that the studies had insufficient power. Methods We enrolled overweight adults from eight European countries who had lost at least 8% of their initial body weight with a 3.3-MJ (800-kcal) low-calorie diet. Participants were randomly assigned, in a two-by-two factorial design, to one of five ad libitum diets to prevent weight regain over a 26-week period: a low-protein and low-glycemic-index diet, a low-protein and high-glycemic-index diet, a high-protein and low-glycemic-index diet, a high-protein and high-glycemic-index diet, or a control diet. Results A total of 1209 adults were screened (mean age, 41 years; body-mass index [the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters], 34), of whom 938 entered the low-calorie-diet phase of the study. A total of 773 participants who completed that phase were randomly assigned to one of the five maintenance diets; 548 completed the intervention (71%). Fewer participants in the high-protein and the low-glycemic-index groups than in the low-protein–high-glycemic-index group dropped out of the study (26.4% and 25.6%, respectively, vs. 37.4%; P = 0.02 and P = 0.01 for the respective comparisons). The mean initial weight loss with the low-calorie diet was 11.0 kg. In the analysis of participants who completed the study, only the low-protein–high-glycemic-index diet was associated with subsequent significant weight regain (1.67 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48 to 2.87). In an intention-to-treat analysis, the weight regain was 0.93 kg less (95% CI, 0.31 to 1.55) in the groups assigned to a high-protein diet than in those assigned to a low-protein diet (P = 0.003) and 0.95 kg less (95% CI, 0.33 to 1.57) in the groups assigned to a low-glycemic-index diet than in those assigned to a high-glycemic-index diet (P = 0.003). The analysis involving participants who completed the intervention produced similar results. The groups did not differ significantly with respect to diet-related adverse events. Conclusions In this large European study, a modest increase in protein content and a modest reduction in the glycemic index led to an improvement in study completion and maintenance of weight loss. (Funded by the European Commission; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00390637.)

Subfields: Cell Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b91e578625db29760e198535eb35125cb18132ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

  1. Antonio Ceriello
  2. Herbert Tilg

In Nutrition and Dietetics

  1. J. Brand-Miller
  2. Brandon H Hidaka
  3. Antonio Ceriello
  4. Herbert Tilg
  5. W. Willett
  6. F. B. Hu

In Physiology

  1. J. Brand-Miller
  2. Kevin D. Hall
  3. S. Bischoff
  4. Antonio Ceriello
  5. Herbert Tilg
  6. W. Willett
  7. F. B. Hu

Citations in the corpus