Fundamental components of attention.

By Eric I. Knudsen. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2007

1,012 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8a1d883cc766e7de05a674a3ab0f546a1a9a810

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Working memory and self-regulation (2011, background): “The regulation of attention is assumed to be subject to a tug-of-war between stimulus-driven (bottomup) influences and the goal-directed (top-down) allocation of attention (Corbetta & Shulman, 2002; Knudsen, 2007; Pashler, Johnston, & Ruthruff, 2001).”
Reward reduces conflict by enhancing attentional control and biasing visual cortical processing (2011, background): “The role of the parietal cortex, in general, and the IPS, in particular, in controlling attention is well documented (Knudsen, 2007; Serences & Yantis, 2006; Shomstein & Behrmann, 2006; Bisley & Goldberg, 2003; Corbetta & Shulman, 2002).”
Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque area V4. (2009, background): “One factor that contributes to this improvement in sensory processing is an attention-dependent increase in the mean firing rates of neurons driven by an attended stimulus and associated reductions in the firing rates of neurons driven by task-irrelevant stimuli (for recent reviews, see Reynolds and”
Electrical Neuroimaging Reveals Timing of Attentional Control Activity in Human Brain (2008, background): “Traditionally, it has been assumed that the frontal lobes initiate top-down attentional control, because regions in frontal cortex are involved in the executive control of other cognitive and motor operations [3].”
THE PERSISTENCE OF POVERTY IN THE CONTEXT OF FINANCIAL INSTABILITY: A BEHAVIORAL PERSPECTIVE (2015, background): “Although we often decide what to attend to, some stimuli are automatically salient or flagged as motivationally salient by reward-processing mechanisms in the brain (Field & Cox, 2008; Knudsen, 2007), which can then hijack our attention, despite conflicting goals.”
Working Memory, Attentional Control, and Expertise in Sports: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research (2016, background): “Attention can be defined as subsuming all cognitive processes esponsible for increasing or decreasing the level of activation f internal or external representations (Desimone & Duncan, 995; Knudsen, 2007; Pashler et al., 2001; Posner & Petersen, 990). According to Pashler et al. (2001) attention inc”
Visual attention: The past 25 years (2011, background): “…Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston, & Ruthruff, 2001; Posner & Rothbart, 2007) and Annual Review of Neuroscience (Bisley & Goldberg, 2010; Colby & Goldberg, 1999; Desimone & Duncan, 1995; Kastner & Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner & Petersen, 1990; Reynolds & Chelazzi, 2004).”
Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook (2012, background): “Recent review of attention in neuroscience indicates that four conceptual components are fundamental to attention: bottom-up or saliency filters, top-down control, competitive visual selection, and working memory (Knudsen, 2007).”
Desire The New Hot Spot in Self-Control Research (2012, background): “, novelty, predictability, reward, and threat) likely to be important for adaptive behavior (Knudsen, 2007).”
Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function (2010, neutral): “selection, working memory, and top–down sensitivity control (Knudsen 2007).”
A multisensory investigation of the functional significance of the "pain matrix" (2011, neutral): “Therefore, the saliency of a stimulus is not determined by a particular feature of the stimulus but by how much each of its different features contrast with the surrounding (Fecteau and Munoz, 2006; Itti and Koch, 2001; Knudsen, 2007; Yantis, 2008).”