Clinical and virological data of the first cases of COVID-19 in Europe: a case series
By F. Lescure, L. Bouadma, Duc Nguyen, M. Parisey, P. Wicky, S. Behillil, A. Gaymard, M. Bouscambert-Duchamp, F. Donati, Q. Le Hingrat and 13 more. Lancet. Infectious Diseases (Print), 2020
1,026 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Background On Dec 31, 2019, China reported a cluster of cases of pneumonia in people at Wuhan, Hubei Province. The responsible pathogen is a novel coronavirus, named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We report the relevant features of the first cases in Europe of confirmed infection, named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with the first patient diagnosed with the disease on Jan 24, 2020. Methods In this case series, we followed five patients admitted to Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital (Paris, France) and Pellegrin University Hospital (Bordeaux, France) and diagnosed with COVID-19 by semi-quantitative RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs. We assessed patterns of clinical disease and viral load from different samples (nasopharyngeal and blood, urine, and stool samples), which were obtained once daily for 3 days from hospital admission, and once every 2 or 3 days until patient discharge. All samples were refrigerated and shipped to laboratories in the National Reference Center for Respiratory Viruses (The Institut Pasteur, Paris, and Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France), where RNA extraction, real-time RT-PCR, and virus isolation and titration procedures were done. Findings The patients were three men (aged 31 years, 48 years, and 80 years) and two women (aged 30 years and 46 years), all of Chinese origin, who had travelled to France from China around mid-January, 2020. Three different clinical evolutions are described: (1) two paucisymptomatic women diagnosed within a day of exhibiting symptoms, with high nasopharyngeal titres of SARS-CoV-2 within the first 24 h of the illness onset (5·2 and 7·4 log10 copies per 1000 cells, respectively) and viral RNA detection in stools; (2) a two-step disease progression in two young men, with a secondary worsening around 10 days after disease onset despite a decreasing viral load in nasopharyngeal samples; and (3) an 80-year-old man with a rapid evolution towards multiple organ failure and a persistent high viral load in lower and upper respiratory tract with systemic virus dissemination and virus detection in plasma. The 80-year-old patient died on day 14 of illness (Feb 14, 2020); all other patients had recovered and been discharged by Feb 19, 2020. Interpretation We illustrated three different clinical and biological types of evolution in five patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 with detailed and comprehensive viral sampling strategy. We believe that these findings will contribute to a better understanding of the natural history of the disease and will contribute to advances in the implementation of more efficient infection control strategies. Funding REACTing (Research & Action Emerging Infectious Diseases).
Subfields: Infectious Diseases
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b881feaed6fb1d656b3f9ecd84c2f5cfedeca507
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Bruce D. Walker
- P. Kaplonek
- Chenyan Jiang
- H. Kuo
- Hugues Allard-Chamard
- A. Khorram‐Manesh
- Pilar Garcia-Broncano
- A. Piechocka-Trocha
Citations in the corpus
- How and why patients made Long Covid (2020, critical): “She used #LongCovid to inter-vene ontologically in formulations of COVID-19 in peer-reviewed papers – by complicating the ‘biphasic ’ disease pathway common in peer-reviewed publications (e.g., Lescure et al., 2020), and pointing to multiple sequelae.”
- Loss of Bcl-6-Expressing T Follicular Helper Cells and Germinal Centers in COVID-19 (2020, positive): “Given that viremia has been observed in this illness (Zheng et al., 2020; Lescure et al., 2020), we also interrogated spleens both in the acute- and late-disease settings and complemented these studies with examination of peripheral blood samples in a separate cohort, wherein convalescence could als”
- Current Response and Management Decisions of the European Union to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Review (2020, background): “The EU is directly contributing to the global response of the WHO by producing daily reports, guidelines, information, and registration of relevant data regarding the number of affected and deaths [14].”