Phylogeography: retrospect and prospect

By J. Avise. 2009

915 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Phylogeography has grown explosively in the two decades since the word was coined and the discipline was outlined in 1987. Here I summarize the many achievements and novel perspectives that phylogeography has brought to population genetics, phylogenetic biology and biogeography. I also address future directions for the field. From the introduction of mitochondrial DNA assays in the late 1970s, to the key distinction between gene trees and species phylogenies, to the ongoing era of multi‐locus coalescent theory, phylogeographic perspectives have consistently challenged conventional genetic and evolutionary paradigms, and they have forged empirical and conceptual bridges between the formerly separate disciplines of population genetics (microevolutionary analysis) and phylogenetic biology (in macroevolution).

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8658f064ffb8a66ce04df1299e15e050f101bf8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Jürgen Dengler
  2. D. Nogués-Bravo
  3. Jeannine Cavender-Bares
  4. K. Marske
  5. Jerald B. Johnson
  6. M. Rius
  7. X. Turon
  8. Frank E. Zachos

In Molecular Biology

  1. X. Turon
  2. Jerald B. Johnson
  3. Jeannine Cavender-Bares
  4. M. Rius
  5. A. Yoder
  6. Jürgen Dengler
  7. F. Werneck
  8. Charles L. Griffiths

In Paleontology

  1. D. Nogués-Bravo
  2. Jerald B. Johnson
  3. A. Yoder
  4. Jens‐Christian Svenning
  5. K. Marske
  6. Jeannine Cavender-Bares
  7. Camilla Fløjgaard
  8. S. Fraga

Citations in the corpus