Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials.
By L. Shankar, John M. Hoffman, S. Bacharach, M. Graham, J. Karp, A. Lammertsma, S. Larson, D. Mankoff, B. Siegel, A. D. Van den Abbeele and 2 more. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2006
731 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b84c148c2f6846ec08dd5fa22f5c232dcf3f5054
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- R. Wahl
- H. Jacene
- Y. Kasamon
- Ronald Boellaard
- M. Juweid
- M. Lodge
- F. Mottaghy
- M. Dietlein
Citations in the corpus
- Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis (2009, methodology): “(35) reported that 18F-FDG uptake was still rising up to 120 min after injection, although uptake curves seemed to become flatter at 60–90 min after injection.”
- Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. (2007, background): “These recommendations were recently addressed by Shankar et al.(38) The Imaging subcommittee generally agrees with those recommendations, noting that the recommendations made by our subcommittee in the current report (eg, with respect to PET timing relative to prior therapy) are more lymphoma specif”
- From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (2009, methodology): “Many factors, including a poor intravenous injection, inaccurate dose calibration or camera calibration, or variable uptake times, can affect the SUL (30).”
- FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 (2014, unknown): “An overview of other and previously published guidelines [10, 21, 61, 68, 78, 99–106] or recommendations can be found in the supplement issue of the Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2009 [58].”
- Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging* (2007, background): “Understanding PVE is of foremost importance in the context of measuring the response to therapy with PET (1,2).”