Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging*
By M. Soret, S. Bacharach, I. Buvat. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2007
1,585 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/69ae9073fd7f0dbfeec147a311e8754755d300ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- I. E. El Naqa
- Hugo J. W. L. Aerts
- Philippe Lambin
- Ronald Boellaard
- Habib Zaidi
- Fabian Isensee
- Klaus Hermann Maier-Hein
- Christos Davatzikos
Citations in the corpus
- Clinical translation of an ultrasmall inorganic optical-PET imaging nanoparticle probe (2014, background): “Because the lesion diameter was slightly less than the resolution (full-width half-maximum ~6 mm) of the clinical PET scanner, these ratios had to be corrected for partial volume effects (24).”
- PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques (2010, background): “Among the many physical degrading factors impacting image quality and quantitative accuracy, partial volume effect is recognized as one of the most important factors impacting tumour imaging [61].”
- A Review on Segmentation of Positron Emission Tomography Images (2014, background): “2–3 times spatial resolution of scanner Adopt an optimal PVE factor [34,35] B.”
- Advances in multimodal data fusion in neuroimaging: Overview, challenges, and novel orientation (2020, background): “Several PVC techniques have been proposed in the literature for improving image quality and quantitative accuracy in PET [360-363] .”
- The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. (2016, methodology): “ As another example intensities measured using MR may be non-uniform across an image and require correction (Sled et al., 1998). FDG-PET-based may furthermore be corrected for partial volume effects (Soret et al., 2007; Boussion et al., 2009). In CT imaging metal objects, e.g. pacemakers, and tooth ”
- Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis (2009, methodology): “This is especially true because methods for overcoming quantitative inaccuracies attributable to (differences in) resolution, so-called partialvolume effects (29), are not widely available yet and, more importantly, are still not sufficiently accurate and precise for structures smaller than 3 times ”