The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where, and why?

By J. Fridley. 2001

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b807a8be0f13f94d5508a40dc6028064d23b2a78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

DIVERSITY–PRODUCTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS IN STREAMS VARY AS A FUNCTION OF THE NATURAL DISTURBANCE REGIME (2005, background): “…experimental work have often been qualitatively different from the patterns observed across larger scales in natural ecosystems (Gross et al. 2000, Fridley 2001, Bengtsson et al. 2002, Chase and Leibold 2002, Symstad et al. 2003, Cardi- Manuscript received 3 November 2003; revised 12 May 2004;…”
Identifying mechanisms of competition in multi‐species communities (2007, background): “The idea is similar to the relative yield total (RYT), which is often used to quantify the overyielding of diverse mixtures relative to monocultures in studies of biodiversity effects on ecosystem function (see Fridley 2001 and references therein).”
Biodiversity Regulation of Ecosystem Services (2005, background): “Here again, if taken uncritically, results from synthetic assemblages may lead to misleading recommendations to land managers (see also Fridley 2001; Schmid 2002; Hodgson et al. 2005).”
Functional diversity predicts overyielding effect of species combination on primary productivity (2009, background): “If possible positive effects are considered negligible (as suggested by deviations from the additive null-model); there is strong evidence that intraspecific competition exceeded interspecific competition in these species combinations � the hallmark of a resource complementarity effect ( Fridley 200”
Partitioning of net primary production in Eucalyptus and Acacia stands and in mixed-species plantations: Two case-studies in contrasting tropical environments (2013, background): “Two positive interactions may contribute to enhance stand productivity in mixed-species plantations with NFS (Fridley, 2001; Kelty, 2006).”
Phylogenetic diversity, trait diversity and niches: species assembly of ferns along a tropical elevational gradient (2011, background): “This will result in a more efficient exploitation of the available resources, which in turn will reduce competitive interactions (MacArthur, 1958; Diáz & Cabido, 1997; Fridley, 2001; Hooper et al., 2005).”
Diversity effects on production in different light and fertility environments: an experiment with communities of annual plants (2003, methodology): “Given that environmental control over the intensity and nature of plant competition has been widely documented (Keddy 1989; Goldberg 1990; Grime 2001), one might expect that plant mixture dynamics, and thus the effect of plant richness on mixture yield, should vary with environment (Austin et al . 1”
Positive species diversity and above‐ground biomass relationships are ubiquitous across forest strata despite interference from overstorey trees (2017, background): “…plays an important role as a mechanisms driving the observed positive diversity–productivity relationships among understory vascular plants since complementarity is likely to play a more prominent role when resources are spatially and temporally heterogeneous (Fridley 2001; Hooper et al. 2005).”
Declining plant diversity: empty niches or functional shifts? (2002, methodology): “In experiments in Sheffield (Grime 2001) with assemblages created as exact replicates using transplants to avoid the vagaries of seedling establishment we have found that even eight replicates may be barely sufficient to establish statistically-significant differences in productivity between differe”
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE (2005, background): “…of response could occur for several reasons, such as primary control by abiotic factors, dominance of ecosystem effects by a single species that was not removed, or strong overlap of resource use by different species (Vitousek and Hooper 1993, Cardinale et al. 2000, Petchey 2000, Fridley 2001).”
Scale‐dependent relationships between tree species richness and ecosystem function in forests (2013, background): “The positive relationships are also consistent with ecological theory on sampling effects, niche complementarity and facilitation (Fridley 2001).”
The role of complementarity and selection effects in P acquisition of intercropping systems (2017, background): “For example, resource-rich environments can promote a more pronounced SE (Fridley 2001, 2002).”
Overyielding in experimental grassland communities - irrespective of species pool or spatial scale (2005, background): “RYT is directly linked to non-transgressive overyielding, where a mixture outperforms the average biomass of its component monocultures (Fridley 2001; or Dmean ¼ RYT ) 1 > 0, Loreau 1998).”
Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. (2006, background): “Either we know too little about the system reliably to identify the functional traits of species and should study it more or other factors play a dominant and overwhelming role in determining ecosystem level processes (Wardle et al. 1997a,b; Grime 1998; Fridley 2001).”