A theorist's view of experiments

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Learning from Minimal Economic Models (2009, background): “…the existence of a model of a certain kind’, Schlimm concludes, they contradict the 13 It is sometimes claimed that folk economics has predictable biases, focusing on wealth and its distribution, and neglecting the production and allocation of goods and their efficiency (cf. Rubin 2003).”
Construal levels and self-control. (2006, background): “Data suggest that waiting for an outcome raises questions about whether and how one will actually receive the outcome and that these issues of probability and feasibility are subordinate concerns to the value of the outcome itself (Keren & Roelofsma, 1995; Rubenstein, 2001; Sagristano, Trope, & Libe”
Experiments in economics: External validity and the robustness of phenomena (2005, background): “Some experimental economists (e.g. Plott 1991; Rubinstein 2001) speak as if all experiments were devoted to the investigation of scientific theories.”
On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations (2018, background): “The laboratory offers great advantages for this purpose, because the researcher has full control over the decision environment in which participants operate (Rubinstein, 2001).”
Response time and decision making: An experimental study (2013, methodology): “These results suggest a direction for new theoretical models to be based on a two-element typology (Rubinstein (2008)).”